Response: Thanks for the not low review but I have to precise what happened: I immediately exposed the problems and the probable printability issue with the design to the customer, and also after the print, when the customer convinced me to ship the defective part, why did he do that? too hurry? No answer about that and the "average/low-quality" vote.
Receive a "low quality " for a so banal production is unpleasant, the print quality was perfect.
The review should be coherent with the service requested and paid, not about extra services/parts or even the 3d model provided, only about how we managed it and valued it, eventually.
We could provide many other services and obtain the perfect result for this order.
My real mistake: not canceling the order immediately like many do but we like our job (we usualy try to help anyone, we received many refused ordreds).
Response: Thanks for the good evaluation of quality, which is the most important vote.
About time: it was regular; I invite everyone is reading to inform me if there is a specific time necessity (I can't set my "times" for production to show them in advance), we can also propose faster shipping.
Overall very good support. Perfect colors, good enough quality (some so-so corners, probably due to the printing definition I asked for or something).
Response: Thanks.
The corners are aproximate when they are near zero:layer are 0,3-0,5mm wide(can be adapted a bit). Standard average definition(the price doesn't have this settings, I know,sorry).
MaGo Lab 
